|
|
| Author |
Message |
dittbub UNA Opponent

Joined: Jan 15 2005
Posts: 685 Location: Ontario
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clubtender UNA Supporter

Joined: Apr 28 2005
Posts: 2943 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: May 07, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| One thing that I notice is that the anti-self defense crowd tend to always use the word need when it comes to discussing the human right to keep and bear arms. If someone exercises his right to keep and bear arms is not a matter of need, it's a matter of personal preference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
herbie UNA Opponent

Joined: Jun 12 2004
Posts: 6132 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: May 07, 2008 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know a few kids that were home schooled and did really well.
The other 99% are little religious zombies or trailer trash mini-me's like they were taught to be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clubtender UNA Supporter

Joined: Apr 28 2005
Posts: 2943 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: May 07, 2008 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| herbie wrote: | I know a few kids that were home schooled and did really well.
The other 99% are little religious zombies or trailer trash mini-me's like they were taught to be. |
Home schooled children average testing two to three grades ahead of their actual grade. Not bad for a bunch of "religious zombies" and "trailer trash".  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Americalex UNA Supporter

Joined: Aug 27 2004
Posts: 4144 Location: Quebec
|
Posted: May 07, 2008 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understood that the other 99% were the unesco braindeads lol
Homechooling may be a terrorist crime now in the US, but it's still worth the risk, considering the alternatives lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sovernty UNA Opponent

Joined: Jun 23 2007
Posts: 1084 Location: New Brunswick
|
Posted: May 07, 2008 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think home schooling depends on the teacher, you'll only be as smart as your parents. The flip side is that the kids may miss out on some important life experience, the street smarts stuff.
As for guns, I own a few, but I have never felt the need to carry one for protection purposes. When I carry my gun(s), if I don't kill something it is considered a bad day. If someone was going to rob me I'm reasonably sure that they would have the gun pointed on me before I could react or reach for my own weapon, except if someone were trying to rob my house in the middle of the night or something.
At want point does or would the second amendment meet it's limit? Is there any reason why someone couldn't carry a taser or a mid evil sword around with them?, and mumble about how they are not crazy they are defending liberty and freedom? At what point does a weapon become too dangerous to be owned by the public?
Last edited by Sovernty on May 08, 2008 12:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cascadiadad UNA Opponent
Joined: Sep 12 2006
Posts: 581 Location: Washington
|
Posted: May 08, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sovernty wrote: | | At what point does a weapon become too dangerous to be owned by the public? |
Depends. In the American system, the people are always meant to wield the greatest power directly. What would be needed to have an overwhelming tactical advantage against the Federal Military? Who else is going to do it? You need big breaks for a fast car. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sovernty UNA Opponent

Joined: Jun 23 2007
Posts: 1084 Location: New Brunswick
|
Posted: May 08, 2008 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You need a lot of expensive armor and jets to compete with that fat cat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cascadiadad UNA Opponent
Joined: Sep 12 2006
Posts: 581 Location: Washington
|
Posted: May 08, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sovernty wrote: | | You need a lot of expensive armor and jets to compete with that fat cat. |
A couple of .45s seems a bit slim doesn't it. I've been digging around a bit with the WTO events here in Seattle. The Anarchists seemed to have cleaned the Feds clocks simply by being organized by Cell phones and IM. They simply out maneuvered and out smarted a much better funded though rigid organization. Guns aren't even close to the most powerful thing folk have going for them. I don't want guns regulated, but I'm more concerned about modern communication and technology. I hope the phone companies that sold themselves to the Fed get bent over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dittbub UNA Opponent

Joined: Jan 15 2005
Posts: 685 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: May 08, 2008 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that kind of communication is a top-down thing though, neh? whether its the government in control, or a large corporation, its not the people in control.
unless you see the government as "WE THE PEOPLE" then you ought to prefer government control |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|