United North America - Helping Canada's Provinces Join The USA
 

 

View Feedback




John Perrott (Milton, Ontario) wrote 1 month ago
The U.S. Constitution
I have read most of the arguments both for and against such a union. Having travelled extensively in both countries, I have reached the conclusion that the differences we have are predominantly REGIONAL differences. As has been pointed out numerous times, Ontario is far different then Alberta, just >>> Read Full Text

 
Rainer (Illinois) wrote 1 month ago
Political implications
The conservative elements in American government--that is, the Republicans--would do whatever was possible in their power to prevent Canada from joining the USA, for one big reason:

They would no longer have a chance of winning the Presidency or a majority in either House of Congress.
>>> Read Full Text

 
Janet (Carp, Ontario) wrote 1 month ago
The way that American law is right now, the American government pretty much has the FDA refusing to hear any new drug submissions having anything to do with the use of marijuana as a medication.

In Canada, medical marijuana is legal. I know because as a person with Multiple Sclerosis I a >>> Read Full Text

 
Keith (Amherst, Nova Scotia) wrote 1 month ago
It's Time
Both countries spend billions of dollars "protecting" ourselves from each other. Canadian customs do not care if you bring in weapons, they only care if you pay the duty on them.

The E.U. is working well with countries that were at war just 3 generations ago. A model that involves, econo >>> Read Full Text

 
Luke (Toronto, Ontario) wrote 1 month ago
Lets Unite our Great Democracies
Raised in Vancouver, i have lived half my adult life in NYC and half in toronto. I'm tired of having to deal with this artificial border. how can we convince canadians that joining the US wouldn't change their identity? they could keep health care, hockey, maple syrup and even tim horton's while gai >>> Read Full Text

 
Ces Cereira (Edmonton, Alberta) wrote 1 month ago
Hopefully some day soon
A United North America would increase the levels of creativity both cultural and scientific. What better gift can we give the future? Had it been done 200 years ago our lives today would be richer in both countries. We should worry less about silly aesthetic worries and look forward to a more develo >>> Read Full Text

 
Robert (Toronto, Ontario) wrote 1 month ago
Guns & Violence
Well, I have a problem here.

They are kinda too much into violence down there...not all Americans, but the death rate in major cities...even when taking per capita into affect, is way too high.

They wouldn't allow a change to their constitution, so why dissolve ours? Give and take >>> Read Full Text

 
Nathan (Camarillo, California) wrote 2 months ago
Mexico is Essential!
I totally endorse this union. There is little to loose and so much to gain in socio-economic union between nations. I firmly believe that a united North American is the only entity in the coming decades that can rightfully compete with the EU economic block and China. What I don’t understand is w >>> Read Full Text

 
Josh LaVigne (Ann Arbor, Michigan) wrote 2 months ago
Hear hear!
Sir,

I agree entirely. As a Michigander, I find it preposterous that I have to sit through a forty-five minute traffic jam and an interrogation to cross a border on the other side of which I find a society identical to my own except for the weight, shininess, and inscription of the money. O >>> Read Full Text

 
Arianna (New Brunswick) wrote 2 months ago
not convinced
To begin: where you commented on how we were once joined to the US you must have been referring to when we were all colonies of Britain, prior to the civil war.


The common acceptance of a large number of people owning fire arms almost on the same level as a vehicle is disturbing. >>> Read Full Text

 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 

Copyright 2008 United North America. All Rights Reserved.