| Mike (Montreal, Quebec) wrote 2 years ago |
| United North America is the way to go |
I strongly agree that borders between those 2 great countries should be removed and have a true union instead of those NAFTA deals that can disappear at will. I love both the USA & Canada. They are lots in common values that are shared that can't be found anywhere else!
I always ask myself >>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Les (Osoyoos, British Columbia) wrote 2 years ago |
| Let's just join |
| I say, let's just do it already. I spend part of the year in Arizona, and wish that I had the freedom to move there if I want to. As others have pointed out, what is the purpose of the border? We are basically the same until you come to Mexico--which is certainly different than Canada and the US.
>>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Charles H Irwin (Arcadia, Oklahoma) wrote 2 years ago |
| Protectionism Hurts Real People |
A few years ago when I was living in Washington, my son got a job offer to work at a greenhouse in BC. He had a certificate in horticulture. It would have been a good job for him.
Here's what happened. I'm not making this up.
We went up there and found him an apartment with no p >>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Christopher Ward (Havre de Grace, Maryland) wrote 2 years ago |
| I support this idea |
| As a Marylander, a state named after a Queen of England, that this idea has taken so long to start being talked about. I totally support Canadian statehood. It just makes sense. I would also support the UK joining up as well, and Australia. North America is the center of freedom and liberty in th >>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Chris Jones (North Vancouver, British Columbia) wrote 2 years ago |
| It is already here just not in name |
| A united North America already exist just not in name. Economic integration is already here and has been for at least twenty years. The only real reason why Canada has not joined the USA already is our corporations would no longer have monopolies. If and when the Canadian government stops its protec >>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Sam (Los Angeles, California) wrote 2 years ago |
| E Pluribus Unum |
| Reading with interest your website entitled "United North America", I wanted to let you know that I've always welcomed and supported the idea of the Canadian provinces and territories joining the Union. I hope that happens one day. However, re-naming America isn't something I, as an American, coul >>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Mark (Calgary, Alberta) wrote 2 years ago |
| Political Clout |
I have a question for you regarding the political aspects of a hypothetical North American Union. If Canada were to join the United States and then send congressmen and senators to Washington, how can you realistically say that they would 'have a voice' in determining the
course of the nation? I >>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Ashley Watson (Quebec City, Quebec) wrote 2 years ago |
| Want to help us out? |
| Being a Scot who lives in Quebec and one of the very few anglophone souveriegnists. I'm constantly trawling around the internet trying to find out peoples views on the place of Quebec in Canada and indeed North America. Your site has helped me to advance better the arguements for Quebec sovereignt >>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| John Perrott (Milton, Ontario) wrote 2 years ago |
| The U.S. Constitution |
| I have read most of the arguments both for and against such a union. Having travelled extensively in both countries, I have reached the conclusion that the differences we have are predominantly REGIONAL differences. As has been pointed out numerous times, Ontario is far different then Alberta, just >>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Rainer (Illinois) wrote 2 years ago |
| Political implications |
The conservative elements in American government--that is, the Republicans--would do whatever was possible in their power to prevent Canada from joining the USA, for one big reason:
They would no longer have a chance of winning the Presidency or a majority in either House of Congress.
>>> Read Full Text |
|
| |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
